Jon Nelson escribió:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pg...@jamponi.net> wrote:

> > That's true. I originally wrote the patch using fallocate(2). What
> > would be appropriate here? Should I switch on the return value and the
> > six (6) or so relevant error codes?
> 
> I addressed this, hopefully in a reasonable way.

Would it work to just assign the value you got from posix_fallocate (if
nonzero) to errno and then use %m in the errmsg() call in ereport()?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to