Jon Nelson escribió: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pg...@jamponi.net> wrote:
> > That's true. I originally wrote the patch using fallocate(2). What > > would be appropriate here? Should I switch on the return value and the > > six (6) or so relevant error codes? > > I addressed this, hopefully in a reasonable way. Would it work to just assign the value you got from posix_fallocate (if nonzero) to errno and then use %m in the errmsg() call in ereport()? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers