On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pg...@jamponi.net> wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: .. >> Some where quick comments, without thinking about this: > > Thank you for the kind feedback. > >> * needs a configure check for posix_fallocate. The current version will >> e.g. fail to compile on windows or many other non linux systems. Check >> how its done for posix_fadvise.
The following patch includes the changes to configure.in. I had to make other changes (not included here) because my local system uses autoconf 2.69, but I did test this successfully. > That's true. I originally wrote the patch using fallocate(2). What > would be appropriate here? Should I switch on the return value and the > six (6) or so relevant error codes? I addressed this, hopefully in a reasonable way. -- Jon
fallocate.patch-v2
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
