Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> On 03/11/2013 12:30 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>>> The problem is that pg_dump is sending an empty query in >>>> versions less than 9.3, and choking on that. Suggested fix >>>> attached - there's really no reason to be doing anything re mat >>>> views in versions < 9.3. >>> This is the same problem that I reported in another thread. >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwH+4vtyq==l6hrupxtggfqrnlf0mwj75bfisoske28...@mail.gmail.com >> >> Oh, I missed that. Yes, either of these would work. > Will push a fix today unless I find that someone has beaten me to > it as I work through the rest of the messages. I agree that either would work. I preferred Andrew's patch because it kept knowledge of this issue more localized. Pushed. Thanks to you both, and apologies for the error. Next time I do anything with pg_dump I will know better what constitutes decent testing. -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
