On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> No, then we don't have a variadic version. You are going to have to accept > that we can't make one function name cover all of this. Well, for me, I would rather specify an array than call a function with a different name. But it’s six of one, half-dozen of another, really, as long as it all works. D -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
