On 02/16/2013 07:50 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:To answer David's point, there is no point in having both get(json,text) get(json, variadic text[]) since the second can encompass the first, and having both would make calls ambiguous.Oh. Well then how about get(json, int) get(json, text) get(json, text[]) ?
No, then we don't have a variadic version. You are going to have to accept that we can't make one function name cover all of this.
cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
