Hello everyone! I'd like to thank you for quick replies and for the thoughtful feedback.
I'm working on improving the current wording and I'm going to follow up shortly with an updated version. Please, stay tuned. Ivan On Feb 11, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a bit >> hard on plain text dumps to me. > > I wasn't terribly thrilled with labeling pg_dumpall "deprecated", > either. It might be imperfect for some use cases, but that adjective > suggests that we're trying to get rid of it, which surely isn't the > case. > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
