Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a bit
> hard on plain text dumps to me.
I wasn't terribly thrilled with labeling pg_dumpall "deprecated",
either. It might be imperfect for some use cases, but that adjective
suggests that we're trying to get rid of it, which surely isn't the
case.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
