On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Mario Weilguni wrote: > Not a lower strength lock, I would, but I'm not so familiar with the postgres > internals. I modified ri-triggers.c to exclude certain tables from the > locking itself (because I know the tables are not updated).
It might help the op of this thread, so it's probably worth posting. :) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
