On Tuesday 20 August 2002 12:15 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Umm, but what about the reply buffer overrun advisory? I've read this > > whole thread, and the reply advisory (AFAICT, unless I've just hit delete > > too quickly) has NOT been addressed.
> Yes it has. CVS logs show > I'd put more stock in the concern level of the people making complaints > if anyone had bothered to do even that much legwork. Without an offered > patch against 7.2 branch, I don't think the folks who push out releases > (which is not me, but Marc, Bruce, you, Trond, etc) should bother to > take notice of the complaints at all. If a patch is proffered to 7.2.1 to fix this, I'll be happy to roll a new RPMset. I tend to agree with you on this detail, Tom. I had just apparently missed that portion; thanks for the reminder. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
