"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But going back to the idea that it seems that the only problem being
> publicised in the 'outside world' is the cash_out(2) version can we
> not do the restriction on acceptable input type in order to claim that
> the fix?
Totally pointless IMHO, when the same problem exists in hundreds of
other functions. Also, there really is no way to patch cash_out per se;
the problem is a system-level problem, namely failure to enforce type
checking. cash_out has no way to know that what it's been passed is the
wrong kind of datum.
Basically, we've used "opaque" as a substitute for accurate type
declarations; that's got to stop.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
