On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Other than getting the array sizes right, it does look like a nice > patch; very small, which is what I'd hoped for. The notion of having to > say "postgres@" still seems kinda ugly, but given the simplicity of the > patch I'm willing to live with that.
Going from postgres to postgres@ ??? I don't care how simple the patch is, I'd rather it was configurable to keep it out completely. That's not just ugly, that's coyote ugly! Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com ========================================================================== ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
