Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > OK, no one complained/commented on my idea of having global users have a > > > > trailing '@', so here is a patch that implements that. It has the > > > > advantages of: > > > > > > Probably because not everyone saw it. I know I didn't. This entire > > > issue is growing more and more complex. How about a configure item > > > to not even compile it in? Or better yet, a configure item to put > > > it there with the default off. > > > > I think I am prety close, and I don't see a configure flag as any better > > than a GUC option that is off by default. > > But how many people would even use it? I can't see adding the bloat > unnecessarily and risking it accidently being turned on. Am I wrong > and really alot of people actually want/need this?
Well, the demand seems to be larger than I thought, considering the number of people who have chimed in and want certain features, like multiple global users. I see this being using more by ISP's and universities that need better user/db partitioning. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
