> Well, per our discussion here in person, I'm not convinced that this > buys us anything in the "let's replace AMQ" case. However, as I pointed > out in my last email, this feature doesn't need to replace AMQ to be > useful. Let's focus on the original use case of supplying a queue which > Londiste and Slony can use, which is a sufficient motivation to push the > feature if the Slony and Londiste folks think it's good enough (and it > seems that they do).
BTW, I talked to Marko Kreen about this feature at the boat party, and he thought it would work for pgQ. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
