Hi, Does this mean we need to wrap new tarballs soon, because of the data loss bug?
Regards, Devrim 14 Eylül 2012, Cuma, 4:42 pm tarihinde, Robert Haas yazmış: > Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries. > > This can result in buffers failing to be properly flushed at > checkpoint time, leading to data loss. > > Report, diagnosis, and patch by Jeff Davis. > > Branch > ------ > REL9_1_STABLE > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fef2c17807e095a04441e4f1fe05f75d5578ead2 > > Modified Files > -------------- > src/backend/access/transam/xlogutils.c | 5 +++++ > src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committ...@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers > -- Temporarily using a webmail program. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
