> As the maintainer of software that does multi-master, I'm a little > confused as to why we would extend pg_bench to do this. The software > in question should be doing the testing itself, ideally via > it's test suite (i.e. "make test"). Having pg_bench do any of this > would be at best a very poor subset of the tests the software > should be performing. I suppose if the software *uses* pg_bench for > its tests already, once could argue a limited test case - but it seems > difficult to design some pg_bench options generic and powerful enough > to handle other cases outside of the one software this change is aimed at.
Well, my point was in upthread: > Right. If pgbench could have such a functionarlity, we could compare > those projects by using pgbench. Currently those projects use > different benchmarking tools. That means, the comparison is something > like apple-to-orange. With enhanced pgbench we could do apple-to-apple > comparison. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
