(2012/06/28 11:16), Robert Haas wrote: > If it can be done without costing anything meaningful, I don't object, > but I would humbly suggest that this is not hugely important one way > or the other. application_name is primarily a monitoring convenience, > so it's not hugely important to have it set anyway, and > fallback_application_name is only going to apply in cases where the > user doesn't care enough to bother setting application_name. Let's > not knock ourselves out to solve a problem that may not be that > important to begin with.
Thanks for clarification. I got the point. The way fixing oid2name and pgbench seems reasonable, so applying it to vacuumlo (as Peter mentioned) would be enough for this issue. Regards, -- Shigeru HANADA -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
