Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of jue jun 28 17:06:49 -0400 2012: > On Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:03:26 PM Andres Freund wrote: > > What I wonder is how hard it would be to remove catcache.h's structs into > > the implementation. Thats the reason why the old and new list > > implementation currently is included all over the backend... > Moving them into the implementation isn't possible, but catcache.h being > included just about everywhere simply isn't needed. > > It being included everywhere was introduced by a series of commits from Bruce: > b85a965f5fc7243d0386085e12f7a6c836503b42 > b43ebe5f83b28e06a3fd933b989aeccf0df7844a > e0522505bd13bc5aae993fc50b8f420665d78e96 > and others > > That looks broken. An implementation file not including its own header... A > minimal patch to fix this particular problem is attached (looks like there > are > others in the series).
Hmm, I think this is against project policy -- we do want each header to be compilable separately. I would go instead the way of splitting resowner.h in two or more pieces. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
