Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of mar jun 26 12:43:34 -0400 2012:
> So, should I keep the enum TimeoutName? Are global variables for > keeping dynamically assigned values preferred over the enum? > Currently we have 5 timeout sources in total, 3 of them are used by > regular backends, the remaining 2 are used by replication standby. > We can have a fixed size array (say with 8 or 16 elements) for future use > and this would be plenty. > > Opinions? My opinion is that the fixed size array is fine. I'll go set the patch "waiting on author". Also, remember to review some other people's patches. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
