Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The code for this is as attached. Note that I'd rip out the normal-path
>> tracking of line boundaries; it seems better to have a second scan of
>> the data in the error case and save the cycles in non-error cases.
> Really?!
Um ... do you have a problem with that idea, and if so what? It would
be considerably more complicated to do it without a second pass.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
