Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I am not sure about the idea of letting the detail run to the end of the
> line; that would be problematic should the line be long (there might not
> be newlines in the literal at all, which is not that unusual). I think
> it should be truncated at, say, 76 chars or so.
Yeah, I was wondering about trying to provide a given amount of context
instead of fixing it to "one line". We could do something like
(1) back up N characters;
(2) find the next newline, if there is one at least M characters before
the error point;
(3) print from there to the error point.
This would give between M and N characters of context, except when the
error point is less than M characters from the start of the input. Not
sure how to display such text together with a line number though; with a
multi-line fragment it would not be obvious which part the line number
refers to. (Backing up over multibyte data might be a bit complicated
too, but I assume we can think of something workable for that.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
