On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Makes sense, will change and commit.
>
> Since the following hunk is repeated 3x, maybe it should be stuffed
> into a function that is then called in three places:

I considered it trivial enough not to do that for it. I can perhaps be
convinced otherwise, but I doubt it's worth it..

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to