On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm not necessarily opposed to commandeering the name "smart" for the >> new behavior, so that what we have to find a name for is the old "smart" >> behavior. How about >> >> slow - allow existing sessions to finish (old "smart") >> smart - allow existing transactions to finish (new) >> fast - kill active queries >> immediate - unclean shutdown > > I could live with that. Really, I'd like to have fast just be the > default. But the above compromise would still be a big improvement > over what we have now, assuming the new smart becomes the default.
Should this new shutdown mode wait for online backup like old "smart" does? Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
