On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm not necessarily opposed to commandeering the name "smart" for the > new behavior, so that what we have to find a name for is the old "smart" > behavior. How about > > slow - allow existing sessions to finish (old "smart") > smart - allow existing transactions to finish (new) > fast - kill active queries > immediate - unclean shutdown
I could live with that. Really, I'd like to have fast just be the default. But the above compromise would still be a big improvement over what we have now, assuming the new smart becomes the default. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
