> I think this line needs some more thought:
>
>> - printf(_(" -m SHUTDOWN-MODE can be \"smart\", \"fast\", or
>> \"immediate\"\n"));
>> + printf(_(" -m, --mode SHUTDOWN-MODE can be \"smart\", \"fast\", or
>> \"immediate\"\n"));
>
> because it's not respecting the intended alignment of the explanation
> column. (It wasn't before, either, but that's not an excuse to not fix
> it.) I think you could make it read just "-m, --mode MODE" and then
> there would be room to align this switch's explanation with the ones
> above it. I'm tempted to also say that the explanation should be
> MODE can be \"smart\", \"fast\", or \"immediate\"
Thanks for the suggestion. I modified the part as you suggested and
committed the changes.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
