On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > In fact, for *most* of these patches the fact that they're still here > should give you pause about just committing them.
Um, yeah. >> I am not sure what the state of the foreign stats patch is, or FK arrays. > > I'm taking the foreign stats one; as I mentioned a bit ago, I think we > need to push an FDW ANALYZE hook into 9.2. I don't like the details of > what's in the current submission but I think it's fixable with not much > effort. Cool. > The FK arrays one I'm kind of queasy about. It's a cool-sounding idea > but I'm not convinced that all the corner-case details have been > adequately thought through, and I'm scared of being unable to fix any > such bugs in later versions because of backwards compatibility worries. > It'd be a lot better to be pushing this in at the start of a devel cycle > than the end. I've been feeling that that patch has been suffering from a lack of reviewer attention, which is a real shame, because I think the functionality is indeed really cool. But I haven't looked at it enough to know what kind of shape it's in. > Most of the rest of this stuff I'm about ready to put off to 9.3. > The risk/reward ratio for committing it on the last day of the last > 9.2 fest doesn't look good. +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
