On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> These patches aren't marked with a committer >> >> FK arrays >> ECPG fetch >> foreign stats >> command triggers >> check function >> parallel pg_dump >> >> Does that mean myself or others should be claiming them for commit/reject? > > I've been right in the middle of the command triggers stuff, so I > suppose I would pick that up for commit if it were ready, but there > hasn't been a new version this week unless I've missed it, and even if > the new version arrived right this minute, I don't think I or anyone > else can do a good job committing a patch of that size in the time > remaining. So I think it's time to formally put that one out of its > misery.
I think doing so will cause substantial misery for many users. I find it hard to believe that such a simple concept hasn't managed to produce some workable subset after months of work. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
