On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:03:41PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > Still, we're looking at dedicated ECPG syntax, quite visible even to folks > with no interest in Informix. We have eschewed littering our syntax with > compatibility aids, and I like it that way. IMO, an option to the "ecpg" > preprocessor is an acceptable level of muddle to provide this aid. A DECLARE > CURSOR syntax extension goes too far.
+1 from me. Let's not add special ecpg sql syntax if we don't absolutely have to. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
