Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I probably should have exposed the query_id directly in the
> pg_stat_statements view, perhaps as "query_hash".
FWIW, I think that's a pretty bad idea; the hash seems to me to be
strictly an internal matter. Given the sponginess of its definition
I don't really want it exposed to users.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
