> It would probably be prudent to concentrate on getting the core > infrastructure committed first. That way, we at least know that if > this doesn't get into 9.2, we can work on getting it into 9.3 knowing > that once committed, people won't have to wait over a year at the very
I don't see why we can't commit the whole thing. This is way more ready for prime-time than checksums. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
