On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:08:41PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > You're wrong. Autovacuum does not consider time, only dead/live tuple > > > counts. The formulas it uses are in the autovacuum docs; some details > > > (such as the fact that it skips tables that do not have stat entries) > > > might be missing. > > > > Oh, yes. Thank you for the correction; not sure what I was thinking. > > > > How would they trigger an autovacuum then? > > We don't have any mechanism to trigger it currently. Maybe we could > inject fake messages to the stats collector so that it'd believe the > tables have lots of new tuples and an analyze is necessary.
Ewe! Yes, I thought some more and realized these are system _views_, meaning we can't just update them with UPDATE. It sounds like something pg_upgrade will have to do with a server-side function, someday. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
