On ons, 2012-02-22 at 10:56 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > The trouble with "leakproof" is that it > doesn't point to what it is that's not leaking, which is information > rather than memory, as many might imagine (and I did) without further > hints. I'm not sure any single English word would be as descriptive as > I'd like.
Well, we have RETURNS NULL ON NULL INPUT, so maybe DOES NOT LEAK INFORMATION. ;-) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
