On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:30:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > On 02/22/2012 04:29 PM, Marc Munro wrote: > >> As the developer of veil I feel marginally qualified to bikeshed here: > >> how about "silent"? A silent function being one that will not blab. > > > I also made this suggestion later in the day. > > SILENT isn't a bad idea. It seems to lead the mind in the right > direction, or at least not encourage people to guess the wrong meaning.
+1 for SILENT. I also liked Kevin's suggestion of DISCREET; it comes closer than SILENT to denoting the property in question, but it also carries a social undertone that feels out of place in a software function declaration. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
