On 17 February 2012 16:29, David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com> wrote: > On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:22 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > >> The purpose being to only have a single statement to set up the >> trigger rather than setting up a separate trigger function which will >> unlikely be re-used by other triggers... or is this of dubious >> benefit? > > +1, though I imagine it would just give it a generated name and save it > anyway, eh?
I had thought about that, yes, but I didn't want to get bogged down in implementation. -- Thom -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
