Jay Levitt <jay.lev...@gmail.com> writes: > [Posted at Andres's request] > TL;DR: Inserting and indexing cubes is slow and/or broken in various ways in > various builds.
> 1. In 9.1.2, inserting 10x rows takes 19x the time. > - 9.1-HEAD and 9.2 "fix" this; it now slows down linearly > - but: 10s > 8s > 5s! > - but: comparing Ubuntu binary w/vanilla source build on virtual disks, > might not be significant FWIW, I find it really hard to believe that there is any real difference between 9.1.2 and 9.1 branch tip on this. There have been no significant changes in either the gist or contrib/cube code in that branch. I suspect you have a measurement issue there. On my not-at-all-virtual Fedora 16 workstation, with 9.1 tip, your test case shows index build times of 100000 rows 3650 ms 1000000 rows 48400 ms 10000000 rows 1917800 ms which confirms the nonlinear scaling in 9.1, though I'm not sure it's not just running out of RAM and having to do a lot of I/O in the last case. (This is an entirely untuned debug build, which probably doesn't help.) It's hard to guess how much available RAM you were working with on your box -- mine's got 4GB. > 2. In both 9.1 and 9.2, there is a long delay before CREATE INDEX realizes > it can't work on an unlogged table Fixed. > 3. In 9.2, creating the 10-million-row index always fails As Alexander noted, this is probably a bug in his recent patch. We'll look at it. (I duplicated it here, so it's plenty real.) > 4. 9.1-HEAD never successfully indexes 10 million rows ("never" = at least > 20 minutes on two runs; I will follow up in a few hours) Works for me (see above), though it's slower than you might've expected. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers