On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Please can we either make it user configurable? > > Weren't you just complaining that *I* was overcomplicating things? > I see no evidence to justify inventing a user-visible GUC here. > We have rough consensus on both the need for and the shape of a formula, > with just minor discussion about the exact parameters to plug into it. > Punting the problem off to a GUC is not a better answer.
As long as we get 32 buffers on big systems, I have no complaint. I'm sorry if I moaned at you personally. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
