Thomas Lockhart writes: > Tatsuo, it seems that we should use SQL99 terminology and commands where > appropriate. We do not yet implement the SQL99 forms of character > support, and I'm not sure if our current system is modeled to fit the > SQL99 framework. Are you suggesting CREATE CONVERSION to avoid > infringing on SQL99 syntax to allow us to use that sometime later?
SQL99 says that the method by which conversions are created is implementation-defined. Tatsuo is defining the implementation. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
