Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, I wonder if we should invent new access privilege for conversion.

I believe the spec just demands USAGE on the underlying function for
the TRANSLATE case, and I don't see why it should be different for
CONVERT.  (In principle, if we didn't use a C-only API, you could
just call the underlying function directly; so there's little point
in having protection restrictions different from that case.)

                        regards, tom lane



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org


Reply via email to