On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I still think this is a matter for HEAD only. We haven't supported > these cases in back branches and so there is little argument for > back-patching.
According to Bruce's original post, there is at least one 9.1 regression here relative to 9.0: >> What is even worse is that pre-9.1, pg_ctl start would read ports from >> the pg_ctl -o command line, but in 9.1 we changed this to force reading >> the postmaster.pid file to find the port number and socket directory >> location --- meaning, new in PG 9.1, 'pg_ctl -w start' doesn't work for >> config-only directories either. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
