On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On ons, 2011-07-27 at 18:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> Also, while it may be true that we haven't used the term specifically >> in SQL sypnoses, it's been extensively used in other parts of the >> documentation, in the names of system functions such as >> pg_relation_size(), > > Well, that thing is just the pinnacle of silliness, because we have > pg_relation_size() and pg_table_size(), which have confusingly different > behaviors.
Yeah, I just got flummoxed by that yesterday. Still, the name's out there... >> and in user-visible error messages (cd >> src/backend/po; git grep relation), so I think you may be trying to >> close the barn door after the horse has got out. > > No, I'm trying to catch the horse. ;-) Fair enough, but I think you're not running fast enough (yet). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
