On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> I think this is basically the right approach but I found what you did >> here a bit wordy, so I simplified it, committed it, and back-patched >> to 9.0 with suitable adjustment. Hopefully I didn't simplify it into >> a form you don't like. > > That looks fine. Minor grammar quibble about: > > + When commenting on a column, > + <replaceable class="parameter">relation_name</replaceable> must refer > + to a table, view, composite types, or foreign table. > > "types" should probably be the singular "type".
Woops. That was dumb. Fixed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
