On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of dom jul 24 01:46:08 -0400 2011: >> > Robert Haas wrote: >> >> > > > Should I fix this in pg_upgrade 9.1 for Windows or just in 9.2? ?The >> > > > check works fine on non-Windows. >> > > >> > > Seems worth back-patching to me. >> > >> > Attached patch applied and backpatched to 9.1. I was able to test both >> > code paths on my BSD machine by modifying the ifdefs. I will have >> > EnterpriseDB do further testing. >> >> Err, why not 9.0? > > The check did not exist in 9.0 -- I mentioned that in the commit > message. I could add the check into 9.0, but we usually don't backpatch > such things.
What do you mean by "such things"? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
