On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Kohei Kaigai <kohei.kai...@emea.nec.com> wrote: >> >> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/sepgsql_contexts: line 33 has invalid >> >> object >> >> type db_blobs >> > It is not an error, but just a notification to inform users that >> > sepgsql_contexts >> > file contains invalid lines. It is harmless, so we can ignore them. >> > I don't think sepgsql.sgml should mention about this noise, because it >> > purely >> > come from the problem in libselinux and refpolicy; these are external >> > packages >> > from viewpoint of PostgreSQL. >> This is in contradiction with the current phrase in the documentation >> that's right after the sepgsql.sql loading: "If the installation process >> completes without error, you can now start the server normally". IMHO if >> there are warnings that can be ignored, it would limit confusion for >> sepgsql users if the documentation would say it at this point, e.g. "If >> the installation process completes without error, you can now start the >> server normally. Warnings from errors in sepgsql_contexts, a file >> external to PostgreSQL, are harmless and can be ignored." >> > Indeed, it might be confusable to understand whether the installation got > completed correctly, or not. > So, I appended more descriptions about this messages, as follows: > > + <para> > + Please note that you may see the following notifications depending on > + the combination of a particular version of <productname>libselinux</> > + and <productname>selinux-policy</>. > +<screen> > +/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/sepgsql_contexts: line 33 has invalid object > ty > +</screen> > + It is harmless messages and already fixed. So, you can ignore these > + messages or update related packages to the latest version. > + </para> > > See the attached patch, that contains other 3 documentation updates. > >> Thank you for this clarification. I have some ideas of things that if >> they were in the documentation they'd helped me. Instead of seeking >> agreement on each item, I propose that I gather documentation additions >> in a patch later after the review, and leave it up to you guys whether >> to include them or not. >> > OK, I like to check them. In addition, I'll also revise the wikipage in > parallel to inform correctly.
Does all of this apply to both 9.1 and 9.2devel? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
pgsql-sepgsql-doc-revise.2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
