Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > So, is you vote for or against the elog(NOTICE)? > > OK, if we are still voting, then I'll mention that I generally dislike > the idea of notices of this kind. And would not like this notice in > particular. So would vote no with both hands ;) > > I'm pretty sure that we have a consensus policy (hmm, at least if a > consensus consists of repeated votes on one question or the other) that > notices to protect people from doing what they ask the system to do are > not generally desirable. > > Putting messages in as a spur to development is not particularly > effective; witness a few chapters in the docs which consist of "This > needs to be written. Any volunteers?" and which have stayed untouched > for three years now ;)
OK, elog(NOTICE) is voted down. SGML docs are updated. We don't need an FAQ item for this, do we? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
