> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:31 PM > To: Dann Corbit > Cc: Tom Lane; Neil Conway; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What is wrong with hashed index usage? > > > Dann Corbit wrote: > > > I was thinking of this during CREATE INDEX ... hash: > > > > > > NOTICE: Hash index use is discouraged. See the CREATE INDEX > > > reference page for more information. > > > > > > Does anyone else like/dislike that? > > > > I think it might be OK temporarily, to show that there is > some work that > > needs done. When hashed indexes are fixed, the notice should be > > removed. > > Oh, yes, clearly, we would remove it once we had a hash implementation > that had _any_ advantages over btree. > > So, is you vote for or against the elog(NOTICE)?
I will defer to the preference of the others. I lean ever so slightly towards the notice, because it is very unusual for hashed index not to be faster for single item lookup. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org