On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Noah Misch <n...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:06:46PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Noah Misch <n...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > CheckIndexCompatible() calls ComputeIndexAttrs() to resolve the new 
>> > operator
>> > classes, collations and exclusion operators for each index column.  It then
>> > checks those against the existing values for the same.  I figured that was
>> > obvious enough, but do you want a new version noting that?
>>
>> I guess one question I had was... are we depending on the fact that
>> ComputeIndexAttrs() performs a bunch of internal sanity checks?  Or
>> are we just expecting those to always pass, and we're going to examine
>> the outputs after the fact?
>
> Those checks can fail; consider an explicit operator class or collation that
> does not support the destination type.  At that stage, we neither rely on 
> those
> checks nor mind if they do fire.  If we somehow miss the problem at that 
> stage,
> DefineIndex() will detect it later.  Likewise, if we hit an error in
> CheckIndexCompatible(), we would also hit it later in DefineIndex().

OK.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to