Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.
> >
> > This one which makes 50432 the default port.
> 
> There appear to be some other changes mixed into this patch.

The additional changes were to have the existing environment variables
begin with "PG", as requested.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to