On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 24 22:22:55 -0400 2011: >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > >> >> > You want the environment variable support removed? >> >> >> >> I don't. ?It's production usefulness is questionable, but it's quite >> >> handy for testing IMO. >> > >> > If that's what you want, I think being able to read a file (whose >> > filename you pass with a switch to pg_upgrade) with a bunch of settings >> > is even more convenient. ?Heck, maybe it's more convenient for the user >> > too. >> >> If someone wants to do the work, I'm all in favor. But I don't feel >> that we should insist that Bruce do it. > > Is there agreement to remove all pg_upgrade-specific environment > variables?
I'm not in favor of that unless we have a workable replacement for them. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
