Excerpts from Florian Pflug's message of lun jun 20 06:55:42 -0400 2011:
> The latter (i.e. regexp literals enclosed by /../) probably isn't
> desirably for postgres, but the former definitely is (i.e. distinguishing
> regexp's and text in the type system). Please see the thread
> "Adding a distinct pattern type to resolve the ~ commutator stalemate"
> for the details of the proposal.
'your text' ~ regexp 'your.*foo'
column ~ regexp 'your.*foo'
So you could do
regexp 'foo.*bar' ~ 'your text'
and it's immediately clear what's up.
The question is what to do wrt implicit casting of text to regexp.
If we don't, there's a backwards compatibility hit.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
