Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > >> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mi? jun 01 18:22:56 -0400 2011: > >>> ISTM that it would be useful to run postgres in a mode where it > >>> doesn't actually try to start up the database, but parses > >>> postgresql.conf and then exits, perhaps printing out the value of a > >>> certain GUC as it does so. ?In this case, data_directory. > > > >> I had the same thought, and wondered if we could use the feature > >> elsewhere. > > > > This was suggested quite some time ago, IIRC, but we never got round to it. > > > > The main problem in the current context is that it only fixes the issue > > so long as you ignore the possibility that relevant values were > > specified on the command line or via environment variables, rather than > > coming directly from the config file. ?PGDATA is thus a particular > > hazard here: all you need is to be running with a different PGDATA > > setting in your environment than was used when "pg_ctl start" was > > issued, and you're hosed. > > I guess I'm missing something here. If you change PGDATA, you're > going to be working on a different cluster, but that's what you asked > for. I guess there could be a problem if you used pg_ctl -D dir > start, and postgres --tell-me-the-data-dir relied on PGDATA in telling > you what the data directory should be, but that seems simple to work > around: just have -D dir set $PGDATA before invoking postgres.
Is this just part of our existing TODOs? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
