> No, it isn't. You're making way too many assumptions about where things > really were and what arguments were given to pg_ctl start. We went > around on this before, which is why it's not "fixed" already.
What should I search on? I can't find the relevant discussion. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
